Claude Sonnet 5 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro: which API costs less?
Averaged across three realistic workloads, DeepSeek V4 Pro is about 87% cheaper than Claude Sonnet 5. Below: raw rates and side-by-side monthly costs, computed from prices verified 2026-07-05 (we track what you are billed today, promos included).
Rates per 1M tokens
| Model | Input | Output | Cached input |
|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Sonnet 5Anthropic | $2 | $10 | $0.200 |
| DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek | $0.435 | $0.870 | $0.015 |
Claude Sonnet 5: Cena promocyjna do 31.08.2026; standardowo $3/$15 (cache $0.30).
Monthly cost, side by side
| Workload | Claude Sonnet 5 | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
Customer-support chatbot 2M input + 0.5M output tokens/month, 60% of input served from prompt cache | $6.84 | $0.800 | DeepSeek V4 Pro −88% |
RAG / document Q&A 20M input + 1M output tokens/month, 70% cached (shared context) | $24.80 | $3.68 | DeepSeek V4 Pro −85% |
Agentic coding assistant 50M input + 5M output tokens/month, 80% cached (long sessions) | $78.00 | $9.28 | DeepSeek V4 Pro −88% |
Your traffic looks different? Run your own numbers in the calculator.
FAQ
Which is cheaper: Claude Sonnet 5 or DeepSeek V4 Pro?
Across three realistic workloads (chatbot, RAG, agent), DeepSeek V4 Pro works out about 87% cheaper than Claude Sonnet 5 on average. Raw rates: Claude Sonnet 5 $2/$10 per 1M tokens vs DeepSeek V4 Pro $0.435/$0.870. Verified 2026-07-05.
Does prompt caching change the comparison?
Yes — cached input costs $0.200 on Claude Sonnet 5 and $0.015 on DeepSeek V4 Pro. Our scenario numbers already include realistic cache hit rates.
Is cheaper always better?
No. Price is one axis — model capability, context window and latency differ. This page answers only the cost question; benchmark quality on your own tasks before switching.